On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 08:28:57AM +0000, Mo Zhou wrote:
> I second this proposal, and the same for src:liblinear.
That's done as I wrote.
> These are high popcon packages, dependencies for a number of other
> packages. They should be team maintained to unblock important fixes.
To push a bit I just commited
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libsvm
Last maintainer upload was more than 3 years ago, 2 NMUs inbetween,
package is lagging behind upstream. Anybody is kindly invited to adapt
the packaging (I think we should really get rid of cdbs since this in
turn is Python2) and proceed from here.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 08:35:28AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Chen-Tse,
> >
> > I'm maintaining a package that depends from libsvm. Due to bug #936924
> > that did not received any response since August it is in danger to be
> > removed from testing so I'm interested that this bug will be fixed.
> > When looking at the package I realised that while it would fit into
> > Debian Science team scope it is not team maintained nor is there any
> > repository in Salsa. That's why I have the following suggestion:
> >
> > 1. I create a repository on Salsa
> > 2. Move the package to Debian Science team maintenance
> > and add you as Uploader
> > 3. Drop Python2 package and close bug #936924
> > 4. May be migrate packaging from cdbs to dh
> >
> > If I do not hear from you until Monday I assume you agree with this
> > plan and will do so.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> > PS: @Christian: I noticed that you and Chen-Tse are maintaining
> > liblinear. I have just removed Python2 package and reassigned
> > #936889 to ftp.debian.org to make sure python-liblinear will be
> > removed. Thus libsvm can be dealt as suggested.
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
> >
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de