Le dimanche 16 décembre 2018 à 01:51 +0000, Mo Zhou a écrit : > Some time ago we discussed about packages for BLAS64 ABI/API. > Here are some updates about the subsequent works: > > * blas64 and lapack64 symlinks and alternatives have been added to intel-mkl. > > src:intel-mkl > bin:libmkl-rt > enhances: libblas.so.3, libblas64.so.3, liblapack.so.3, liblapack64.so.3 > alternative: libblas64.so.3 -> libmkl_rt.so > liblapack64.so.3 -> libmkl_rt.so > ... > bin:libmkl-dev > enhances: libblas64.so, liblapack64.so, ... > alternative: libblas64.so -> libmkl_rt.so > liblapack64.so -> libmkl_rt.so > > * A new BLAS implementation called BLIS[1] is nearly ready to upload. > This is likely the first package that will provide 64bit BLAS API/ABI > in main section of our archive. > > BLIS supports three different threading models, just like openblas. > The difference is that, BLIS will be compiled 6 times with different > configurations: > > (openmp, pthread, serial) x (32-bit, 64-bit) = 6 combinations > > BLIS shared libraries with different threading models and the same > index length cannot coexist. Any 32-bit lib can co-exist with any > 64-bit one. > > src:blis > bin:libblis1 (meta) > deps: libblis1-openmp | libblis1-pthread | libblis1-serial > provides: libblas.so.3 > bin:libblis64-1 (meta) > deps: libblis64-1-openmp | ... > provides: libblas64.so.3 > ... > > Note that BLIS doesn't provide LAPACK implementation. > > @Sebastian: Does this look good to OpenBLAS? I don't understand what your actual question is. Could you be more specific? -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part