Hi Andreas, On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:52:10 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Philip, > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 06:57:22PM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote: >> the packaging effort for shiny-server stalled some month ago. I totally lost >> interest in packaging it as I now use shinyproxy[1] at $work. > > There is interest remaining here (local users and I was asked by Debian > friends). > >> As we are heading towards the freeze, I think it's time to discuss how to proceed. >> Getting shiny-server into Debian is still a lot of work, see [2]. Actually only >> one out of 13 nodejs packages that need to be packaged hit the archive. > > Yes. > >> Is anyone willing to step in and finish the work? Andreas, are you still interested? > > I admit there are lots of existing packages with open RC bugs and I simply have > not found the time to do anything in this direction. > >> If no one steps in until end of October I'll file a RM bug for node-pinkyswear and >> close the ITP/RFP bugs that are listed in [2]. > > Please do not RM existing stuff. If you want to get rid of that package > personally I can add myself as Uploaders and take over ownership of the > ITP/RFPs. I think the latter will be automagically turned into RFPs so > there is not really any work needed. Yes, please add yourself to Uploders of node-pinkyswear (and remove myself) and please take ownership of the ITP/RFP bugs. Thanks for taking care of shiny-server (and so many other packages)! Best, Philip >> [1] https://www.shinyproxy.io >> [2] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/shiny-server/wikis/Packaging-ToDo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature