Re: State of shiny-server packaging
Hi Philip,
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 06:57:22PM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
> the packaging effort for shiny-server stalled some month ago. I totally lost
> interest in packaging it as I now use shinyproxy[1] at $work.
There is interest remaining here (local users and I was asked by Debian
friends).
> As we are heading towards the freeze, I think it's time to discuss how to proceed.
> Getting shiny-server into Debian is still a lot of work, see [2]. Actually only
> one out of 13 nodejs packages that need to be packaged hit the archive.
Yes.
> Is anyone willing to step in and finish the work? Andreas, are you still interested?
I admit there are lots of existing packages with open RC bugs and I simply have
not found the time to do anything in this direction.
> If no one steps in until end of October I'll file a RM bug for node-pinkyswear and
> close the ITP/RFP bugs that are listed in [2].
Please do not RM existing stuff. If you want to get rid of that package
personally I can add myself as Uploaders and take over ownership of the
ITP/RFPs. I think the latter will be automagically turned into RFPs so
there is not really any work needed.
Thanks for your initial work and as well for this ping.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> [1] https://www.shinyproxy.io
> [2] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/shiny-server/wikis/Packaging-ToDo
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: