Ok, On 24/05/18 10:38, Julien Puydt wrote: > Hi > Le 24 mai 2018 07:03, Jerome BENOIT <calculus@rezozer.net> a écrit : >> >> I am confused here: >> do you mean that the dependant packages must be uploaded with a build-dep on = 5.2.0 ? >> > > The current fpylll isn't compatible with the next fplll, so I think it's better to reupload it with a cutting dep and let it go to testing. > > When we will be done checking everything is alright in experimental and will start the transition, the package manager will know what to do. > > Or we might get lucky and the new fpylll will be compatible with both versions of fplll... > > Is the new fpylll released? Can you check it against the fplll on salsa? I will check this week-end, Jerome > > Cheers, > > Snark > -- Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net http://www.rezozer.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature