Hello, On 24/05/18 02:02, Julien Puydt wrote: > > Hi, > > Le 23/05/2018 à 08:18, Julien Puydt a écrit : > >> I just packaged fplll 5.2.1 in the repository. There's a soname bump, so >> I'm not planning to upload it that soon. I'll first upload to >> experimental when I'll have checked the immediate rdeps, then prepare >> for a transition. > > Ok, it's not a simple bugfix : it breaks fpylll (but not gap-float and > sollya -- and I only checked the direct reverse depends). > > Since it's the same upstream, I propose : > - an upload of the current fpylll with a build-dep on = 5.2.0 (>= 5.2.0 > is not good) ; I am confused here: do you mean that the dependant packages must be uploaded with a build-dep on = 5.2.0 ? > - when a fixed fpylll gets out, I upload the new fplll to experimental, > then we get that fixed fpylll in experimental too and check that the > other reverse depends are ok ; > - if all would go well, request a transition and proceed. > > Does that look good? Jerome > > Snark on #debian-science > -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature