Re: pandas -- I think we should drop BE platforms
That is why I cross posted original email to their mailing lists.
Pandas builds are lengthy, codebase complex, I do not remember (m)any patches (besides disabling tests) coming up for those architectures, pretty much for every release we ended up filling RM requests for those architectures.
I really do not see the point of wasting computational resources by building on those architectures
On February 24, 2018 3:16:49 PM EST, Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Le 24/02/2018 à 21:08, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
>> No, leave "Architecture: any". Then the builds will fail on those
>> arches. This is what porters generally prefer, because they have a
>> clear information about what is wrong with the package on their
>> arch (and possibly they can act and send patches).
>
>>From the original mail, it doesn't look like porters have been helpful
>yet. Perhaps a better suggestion would be : get in touch the porters
>before you decide to let things down...
>
>Snark on #debian-science
--
Sent from a phone which beats iPhone.
Reply to: