Re: Project creation in science-team (Was: Re: Packaging shiny-server (Was: Bug#886815: ITP: r-cran-git2r -- GNU R access to Git repositories))
Hi Andreas,
On 05.02.2018 at 11:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> The packaging is here (I'd like to move it to .../science-team/... before uploading)
>>
>> https://salsa.debian.org/rinni-guest/node-pinkyswear
>
> Could you please move to science-team first to make me evaluate the final
> status of the package?
Done: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/node-pinkyswear
[The remarks for debian/control hold here as well. But I'd prefer to not change it
for this package as I still hope to get it under the javascript umbrella sometime.]
>> And here it the packaging of node-shiny-server-client which should be in
>> science-team anyway
>>
>> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/node-shiny-server-client
>
> I've requested a release tag on Github[1]. This would help to create a
> sensible watch file.
Ah, that's a good idea!
> Moreover some cosmetic remark: I'm very used to the cme file layout of
> debian/control. You get it when using
>
> cme fix dpkg-control
>
> ... at least under normal conditions. Cme is not yet adapted to salsa
> so it does not yet work with the current control file. I hacked around
> this and commited the result. I do not insist in this form but in teams
> with lots of contributors its nice to have some common layout to let
> the packages look somehow "familiar" for sponsors. If you have strong
> esthetic reasons to insist on your old formatting feel free to revert
> my last commit.
>
> Both things are no reason to stop me from sponsoring. So if you confirm
> that my last commit is fine for you I'll upload as it is now - otherwise
> I'll upload your latest commit.
For me it's OK. I tried to stick to the Node.js packaging template to make it
easier for Noe.js people to review it. As this package will stay in science-team
anyway I think using the cme file layout is fine.
Thanks for the review!
Philip
Reply to: