Re: scalapack 2.0 now in experimental
- To: Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>, DebiChem Project <debichem-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
- Cc: Debian Science List <debian-science@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: scalapack 2.0 now in experimental
- From: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 02:14:51 +0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1504980891.29928.80.camel@debian.org>
- Reply-to: dparsons@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <04151680-55e5-73d9-c9bc-50d03b4533cb@debian.org>
- References: <20170327143045.7cmqletzdqqe7ail@nuc.brown.edu> <1495863167.19257.12.camel@debian.org> <20170604153010.3fjoxx5kutjv7k2x@zarathustra.debian.org> <1496923435.10486.117.camel@debian.org> <CA+WEVrwQOTDe7WsKMBPbR22rU1+dEPBKttdr4E=V97APCGHYTg@mail.gmail.com> <a69af15b-ec22-2518-26ed-570f13ae1e87@debian.org> <CA+WEVrz97-OD7uMSKfYXd2uYjZcxRFupHvoJvGUy3=ydTyhiYg@mail.gmail.com> <1499429599.29230.19.camel@debian.org> <CA+WEVrwABqToRp=OoNQk4WLg_Fo19s3Ua1RxKaaBr0NGhJ+6pA@mail.gmail.com> <1499439198.29230.20.camel@debian.org> <1499606680.29230.35.camel@debian.org> <1500476775.30351.32.camel@debian.org> <04151680-55e5-73d9-c9bc-50d03b4533cb@debian.org>
The scalapack 2 transition is now live, uploaded to unstable.
Drew
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 11:05 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi Drew
>
> On 19/07/2017 17:06, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > scalapack 2.0 is now available in experimental. It's quite a big
> > transition (absorbing blacs, most notably) so we'll want to test
> > dependent packages before dropping it into unstable. We need to
> > check
> > the transition from blacs to scalapack is smooth.
> >
> > Can you tell us (or commit to the scalapack git directly) if we
> > need
> > any tweaks to keep elpa, c2pk and espresso happy?
> >
> > scalapack now builds with cmake and we may want to change the way
> > we
> > install its cmake scripts. pkg-config also. We've built both
> > openmpi
> > and mpich versions.
>
> Thanks for your work on this!
>
> I plan to enable scalapack support in gpaw soon (it requires >=
> 2.0.1)
> and will let you know if any tweaks are required.
>
> Regards
> Graham
>
Reply to: