Re: updated packages: r-cran-afex, r-cran-logspline, r-cran-desolve
On 22/04/2016 19:38, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Jonathon, remember that lintian is not omniscient, and that you are
supposed to *think* before doing anything, and not just trust lintian
(or whatever other linting tool). Packages have to comply to the
Debian Policy, not lintian :)
yeah, i kinda imagined the uploaders approval process contained a:
if (hasWarnings)
reject()
some times when you're going through and creating a README.source, and
documenting, like 50 included R data files (explaining why the source
contains binary files), when you know that no-one will ever read it ...
you start thinking in terms of "what will get this over the line?",
rather than "i want to package this well" (perhaps this makes me a bad
packager).
but i see your point.
jonathon
Reply to:
- References:
- updated packages: r-cran-afex, r-cran-logspline, r-cran-desolve
- From: Jonathon Love <jon@thon.love>
- Re: updated packages: r-cran-afex, r-cran-logspline, r-cran-desolve
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Re: updated packages: r-cran-afex, r-cran-logspline, r-cran-desolve
- From: Jonathon Love <jon@thon.love>
- Re: updated packages: r-cran-afex, r-cran-logspline, r-cran-desolve
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Re: updated packages: r-cran-afex, r-cran-logspline, r-cran-desolve
- From: Jonathon Love <jon@thon.love>
- Re: updated packages: r-cran-afex, r-cran-logspline, r-cran-desolve
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Re: updated packages: r-cran-afex, r-cran-logspline, r-cran-desolve
- From: Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>