Re: Fwd: RFS: arrayfire/3.0~beta-1 [ITP] -- High performance library for parallel computing
Hi Ghislain,
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 02:50:52PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > However, what I really like to see is a discussion in Debian Science to
> > update our policy document. It is far from beeing up to date and if new
> > workflows gain traktion amongst developers this should be mentioned
> > there. I see this a way more urgent issue than whether a hand full of
> > metadata of our packages are not properly read and displayed on the
> > tasks pages.
> >
> I could not agree more. The policy badly needs an update IMO.
+1
> > Which is fine for me - but as I said we should discuss this in Debian
> > Science and I wonder whether you would like to start a discussion of the
> > policy (which I personally do not want since I'll be not regularly
> > online until mid of June (which also means for you that SoB will be
> > delayed (heavily?) for the next four weeks.
>
> I am happy to start this discussion and guide us through to a revision of
> the Debian
> science policy which is more inline with current packaging practices.
>
> Shall I start it now though or wait until your return mid-June ? I did not
> understand that
> part.
Feel free to start now. I'm not that strongly involved in technical
discussions of Debian Science and my contribution to the existing policy
document is basically zero.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: