Re: Sagemath: going further: singular
Thanks for the prompt reply.
On 08/03/15 21:02, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> when this ticket is done:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17254
>
> Maybe for Sage 6.7 I guess. If we're lucky they may even still put it
> into Sage 6.6.
>
> If you have too much time and feel like setting up a Debian unstable (I
> used schroot) you can even build sage 6.5 using Debian packages now with
> only 40 or so failing doctests. We can always use help with fixing
> these. Instructions on
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Sage
In fact, I wondering whether or not I may consider to package Singular 3 at one point.
For now, it is certainly better to finalize the package singular 4: lacking dependencies,
documentation, and certainly more.
Best wishes,
Jerome
>
> Best,
> Tobias
>
> Am 08.03.2015 um 20:54 schrieb Jerome BENOIT:
>> Hello List,
>>
>> On 08/02/15 14:35, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have just deposited singular 4 at Alioth.
>>
>> and now it in the NEW queue.
>>
>> Whatever, I have a question about Sage:
>> at what point, so to speak, Sage may use singular 4 ?
>>
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Jerome
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jerome
>>>
>>> On 01/02/15 21:05, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> On 01/02/15 20:37, Julien Puydt wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been a little busy with sage recently :
>>>>>
>>>>> jpuydt@cauchy:~/sage-exp$ wc -l /tmp/ptestlong.log.* 247159
>>>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.1 91206 /tmp/ptestlong.log.2 21563
>>>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.3 13453 /tmp/ptestlong.log.4 15762
>>>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.5 12012 /tmp/ptestlong.log.6 10320
>>>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.7 411475 total
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me remind you all of this is done by using as many
>>>>> system-installed packages as possible, in order to see which debian
>>>>> packages need to be modified and how. Until now, only maxima needs
>>>>> some love, and we're lacking packages for : libgap, cddlib, rubiks,
>>>>> sagenb, sagetex, singular and jmol.
>>>>
>>>> singular is on its way (without the user documentation to begin with,
>>>> but at this stage it might not be that important):
>>>> I have to revisit d/copyright, and then bring to git my ready material.
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise, I thought that libgap could be worked around.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have attached my current patch ; I'm sorry it is a big contains-all
>>>>> patch and not a series, but it's easier to work like this for the
>>>>> moment. I'm exploring uncharted territory, not doing clean packaging.
>>>>> Yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> The src/sage/interfaces/gp.py part has been quite painful to obtain,
>>>>> but might make Felix cry -- of joy!
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope that helps,
>>>>>
>>>>> Snark on #debian-science
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes,
>>>> Jerome
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net
http://www.rezozer.net/
Reply to: