[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Fwd: Do I need specific binary package relationships in this case ?




2015-01-15 17:39 GMT+00:00 Jose Luis Rivero <jrivero@osrfoundation.org>:
Hello Ghislain:

On 15/01/15 18:27, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am currently packaging an update of libnfft. The new version brings
> along support for multi-precision, which means more binaries can be
> created and a transition should be occuring between the old and new
> package layout.
>
> Version 3.2 is currently in the archive and provides:
> - libnfft3-1  -- double precision version
> - libnfft3-dev  -- headers and dev stuff
>
> Version 3.3, which also got a sodump, now builds:
> - libnfft3-double2  -- double precision version
> - libnfft3-single2  -- single precision version
> - libnfft3-long2  -- long double precision version
> - libnfft3-dev  -- headers and dev stuff
> - libnfft3-2  -- transitional package, should probably install single,
> double and long versions
>
> Do I need to provide any specific breaks / replaces relationship between
> the packages to make sure the upgrade path is properly covered ?
>

When I faced this same situation in the past, I found really useful the
following documentation pages:

 - https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition
 - https://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package

Hope it helps. Kind Regards.



These are great resources. Thanks for sharing.

Am I right to assume case #8 in [1] ?


Cheers,
- Ghis


Reply to: