Re: octomap_1.6.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
- To: debian-science@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: octomap_1.6.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
- From: Jose Luis Rivero <jrivero@osrfoundation.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:19:14 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 53DB93D2.2050205@osrfoundation.org>
- In-reply-to: <20140731120640.GJ10798@an3as.eu>
- References: <E1X5aQn-0006Ks-Bb@franck.debian.org> <3466980.vCdIJSzz5L@indiana> <53D984EE.1070505@osrfoundation.org> <201407311207.58795.leopold.palomo@upc.edu> <20140731120640.GJ10798@an3as.eu>
On 07/31/2014 02:06 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> That's currently my most hated lintian warning - lintian is simply wrong
> here since uscan knows the Files-Excluded feature. There are some
> devscripts/uscan bugs/discussions around this.
>
>>> Does something like the following patch work for your problem?
>>>
>>> diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch
>>> index ff4a10c..9a324ac 100644
>>> --- a/debian/watch
>>> +++ b/debian/watch
>>> @@ -3,7 +3,5 @@
>>> version=3
>>>
>>> # For GitHub projects you can use the tags page:
>>> -opts=uversionmangle=s/$/+dfsg/ \
>>> +opts=dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg// \
>>> https://github.com/OctoMap/octomap/tags .*/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz
>>> -
>>
>> Good!!!!!!
>
> ... to suppress the lintian warning ... but bad if it comes to
> downloading a properly named orig tarball. Please revert this and
> ignore the lintian warning.
>
Ouch, good to know. Thanks for the trick Andreas.
--
Jose Luis Rivero <jrivero@osrfoundation.org>
Reply to: