Re: octomap_1.6.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>]

Hi Leopold,

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:55:30PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > You can verify this by just trying
> > 
> >    uscan --verbose --force-download --repack --compress xz
> > 
> > and see how the result will be named (in both cases).
> 
> Andreas propose, two files:
> - octomap_1.6.6+dfsg.orig.tar.xz with the deleted files and dfsg modification
> - v1.6.6.tar.gz the original from upstream.
> 
> Jose propose, two files:
> - octomap_1.6.6.orig.tar.xz with the deleted files and dfsg modification
> - v1.6.6.tar.gz the original from upstream.
> 
> change reverted and pushed.

+1

> I have tried to overrive the warning without 
> success.

I see no point in overriding a warning where lintian is simply wrong.
It should not be hidden until lintian is fixed - than it will vanish
automatically.

> So, please Andreas, check it again and cross your fingers that will pass ftp-
> master filter.

Uploaded and crossing fingers

        Andreas.


-- 
http://fam-tille.de