|
Hi everyone, On afterthoughts, I believe the naming of the packages built from the pyfftw source package that I personally maintain should be changed. The package only entered the main archive recently, so I am expecting this change not to impact users too much. Main reasons for the renaming are the following, by order of importance: - to respect section 3.3 of the Debian Python Policy, regarding "Module Package Names" "The binary package for module foo should preferably be named python-foo "- confusion with the existing python-fftw package - the -fftw3 suffix is meaningless, should the FFTW lib move to version 4 in the future - the -fftw3 suffix could be useful to FFTW, should upstream decide to provide their own Python wrappers in the future Please let me know the best approach to deal with this. I will correct this too for pyNFFT, which is not yet packaged. Sorry for the newbie mistake. Many thanks, Ghislain |