Please check Debian Science robotics tasks (Was: [SCM] choreonoid branch, master, updated. ...)
Hi Thomas,
I became aware of your recent commits to Debian Science repository of
some robotics related packages. I have no idea about robotics packages
but from the description it looks like this change in the tasks files
would be reasonable:
$ svn diff
Index: debian-science/tasks/robotics-dev
===================================================================
--- debian-science/tasks/robotics-dev (Revision 3804)
+++ debian-science/tasks/robotics-dev (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -5,3 +5,7 @@
for robotics.
Depends: libroboptim-core-dev
+
+Depends: libvisp-dev
+
+Depends: libcnoid-dev
\ No newline at end of file
Index: debian-science/tasks/robotics
===================================================================
--- debian-science/tasks/robotics (Revision 3804)
+++ debian-science/tasks/robotics (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
Depends: morse-simulator
WNPP: 670577
+Depends: choreonoid
+
Depends: solid
WNPP: 500616
Homepage: http://www.dtecta.com
Thomas, as the maintainer of these packages you might possibly know
other candidates that might fit into the tasks robotics[1] and
robotics-dev[2] (they are not yet updated according to my latest change
- something is wrong on alioth which is currently unable to checkout
from svn.d.o). Please at least let me know about these packages or
update the tasks files yourself. If you have no idea what I'm
(continuosely) talking about I might become more verbose and give
links to more information.
Kind regards and thanks for maintaining the robotics packages
Andreas.
[1] http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/psychophysics
[2] http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/psychophysics-dev
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 04:46:29AM +0000, Thomas Moulard wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit 5fd3792f16699c34a02b07009bce4cba0a373e41
> Author: Thomas Moulard <thomas.moulard@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu Jun 13 13:43:53 2013 +0900
>
> Update patch
> ...
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: