[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Mpich 1/2/3



Hi Yvan,

2013/5/26 Yvan Fournier <yvan.fournier@free.fr>:
[..]
> Finally, using the same naming policy as the MPICH developpers
> themselves (referring to the old MPICH as MPICH1, and renaming MPICH2 to
> MPICH when they upgraded to version 3) seems like a sane thing to do,
> and again, the best way to avoid confusion.

I mostly agree with you, but I think this proposed renaming schema is
a little confusing.

Anton


Reply to: