Re: Mpich 1/2/3

[Torquil Macdonald Sørensen <torquil@gmail.com>]

On 26/05/13 21:32, Yann Pouillon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMHO there is absolutely no problem in updating the version of mpich 
> suggested by science-nanoscale-phases. Actually, it still points to 
> mpich because I hadn't noticed that the version had not been updated.
>
> I'll gladly put there whichever name you choose for Mpich 3.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Yann.

Thanks, I'll let you know when it become relevant.

Best regards
Torquil Sørensen