Re: Bug#696782: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668-1 [ITP] -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool
- To: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
- Cc: 696782@bugs.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org, Giulio Paci <giuliopaci@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: Bug#696782: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668-1 [ITP] -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool
- From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 08:21:50 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20130504062150.GC7875@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <20130426215055.GA6242@jwilk.net>
- References: <20130216121025.GA4373@jwilk.net> <20130320225350.GA4440@jwilk.net> <515F8A72.1010203@gmail.com> <20130407200029.GA5935@jwilk.net> <5161DE70.9040303@gmail.com> <20130412223135.GA5946@jwilk.net> <20130416094311.GD23808@an3as.eu> <5178774F.4090105@gmail.com> <20130425064252.GB23699@an3as.eu> <20130426215055.GA6242@jwilk.net>
Hi Jakub,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:50:55PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>, 2013-04-25, 08:42:
> >It is fine if Jakub is working as sponsor - I know that he is
> >doing a great job in sponsering. However, he can perfectly do
> >this in Debian Science repository as well becasue as collab-maint
> >is writable for any Debian developer the Debian Science repository
> >has the same feature.
>
> I don't feel comfortable with sponsoring a package that is
> maintainer within a team I'm not memeber of; and I have no intention
> to join debian-science any time soon. Sorry!
What I wanted to say is: For you as sponsor the usage of collab-maint or
debian-science should not differ a lot because you can equivalently
access both. The advantage to use debian-science is that other people
from Debian Science are watching commits (which nobody does probably for
collab-maint) and there are other advantages of Debian Science SVN as I
tried to explain previously.
> This is not to say that I have anything against debian-science
> taking over this package/ITP. On the contrary, it might be a good
> idea, since I can't guarantee I'll have time for sponsoring in the
> future.
Thanks for the clarification.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: