Re: RFS: givaro/3.7.1-1
Am Sonntag, den 15.07.2012, 20:04 +0800 schrieb Lifeng Sun:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "givaro"
>
> * Package name : givaro
> Version : 3.7.1-1
> Upstream Author : Thierry Gautier <thierry.gautier@inrialpes.fr>
> Jean-Jouis Roch <Jean-Louis.Roch@imag.fr>
> Gilles Villard <Gilles.Villard@ens-lyon.fr>
> Jean-Guillaume Dumas <Jean-Guillaume.Dumas@imag.fr>
> Pascal Giorgi <pascal.giorgi@lirmm.fr>
> Clement Pernet <clement.pernet@imag.fr>
> * URL : http://ljk.imag.fr/CASYS/LOGICIELS/givaro/
> * License : CeCILL-B
> Section : math
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> givaro-dev-doc - Developer Documentation for Givaro
> givaro-user-doc - User Documentation for Givaro
> libgivaro-dev - arithmetic and algebraic computations - development files
> libgivaro1 - arithmetic and algebraic computations
To me it looks like givaro-dev-doc and givaro-user-doc should better be
libgivaro-doc. The homepage says something about "user documentaion is
lightweight" but to me it sounds like both are library documentation. So
is there really a necessity for dividing between user and developers
documentation at package level? Is there a necessity to ship both or
could we only ship the more detailed(?) developers documentation?
Regards, Daniel
Reply to: