cctbx debian package
> OK, Nevermind that boost problem was my own stupidity. I was compiling against
> my systems boost lib and the version was actually too low. But it's building
> with 1.49 in sid so no problem here. So I'll push my results later.
pbuilder is your friend :)
> python2.6 and python2.7 both build.
how did you solve the boost_python name problem ?
> Why can't we use the systems scons? I was using it. In my understanding the
> compilation is only dependent of the python include or am I missing something?
Yes it would be better to build using the scons provided by Debian. At the end of the process, cctbx should be repackage and removing scons is on the list :)
> Right now, I got several python packages built with the same rather
> simple setup.py. The resulting modules don't run yet because I still
> need to solve small problems with the runtime dependencies.
Can you provide more information about this runtime problem ?
> Sounds promising!
PS: do you know about sastbx http://sastbx.als.lbl.gov/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
It would be nice if your work on cctbx could be easily ported to sastbx.