Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs

To: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
Cc: Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>, Debian Science List <debian-science@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
From: Michael Hanke <mih@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 20:29:21 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20120529182921.GA15178@meiner>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>, Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>, Debian Science List <debian-science@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120529060057.GC18760@an3as.eu>
References: <[🔎] 20120529060057.GC18760@an3as.eu>

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:00:57AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7386/full/nature10836.html

In case you don't want to pay Nature to read about this, you can
alternatively pay Science...

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6078/159

-- 
Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
  - From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>

References:
- [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

Prev by Date: Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
Next by Date: Re: RFS: palp/2.1-1
Previous by thread: Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
Next by thread: Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread