[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: updating mpi-defaults (decommissioning lam)

I think that it is the case indeed.... since the migration is
unavoidable and versioning the dependency on mpi-defaults is not
appropriate for this case, why not simply upload mpi-defaults 1.0
directly to unstable?

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:

> Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> writes:

> > 1) why is the experimental buildd not using the latest experimental
> > package?

> Typically because the build dependencies weren't strict enough to force
> it to, as experimental autobuilders otherwise favor versions from
> unstable.  I haven't checked whether that applies to this particular
> case, though.
=------------------------------   /v\  ----------------------------=
Keep in touch                    // \\     (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko              /(   )\               ICQ#: 60653192
                   Linux User    ^^-^^    [175555]

Reply to: