Re: updating mpi-defaults (decommissioning lam)
I think that it is the case indeed.... since the migration is
unavoidable and versioning the dependency on mpi-defaults is not
appropriate for this case, why not simply upload mpi-defaults 1.0
directly to unstable?
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> writes:
> > 1) why is the experimental buildd not using the latest experimental
> > package?
> Typically because the build dependencies weren't strict enough to force
> it to, as experimental autobuilders otherwise favor versions from
> unstable. I haven't checked whether that applies to this particular
> case, though.
--
.-.
=------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------=
Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User ^^-^^ [175555]
Reply to: