Re: RE : Bug#592701: science-statistics: typo in package description
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:14:32PM +0200, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
>
> I replace for now I think most of the cdd -> blends
Cool. Thanks!
> taking care of a package is quite time consumming especially if you are also the upstream.
> So the more peoples are involve in this debian-science, the easyer it will be for all of us.
Yes, that's the idea.
> I hope that debian-science will become a reference for most of scientists where you can find
> most of the scientific software product and convince peoples to release there software with a dfsg
> compliant licence.
This is an explicite goal of Debian Science and IMHO we are not really
far away (about squeeze+2 or squeeze+3).
> This non commercial clause cause that we found in a great number of scientific software
> is realy a problem.
Unfortunately yes.
> what is the position of debian science for the distribute of that kind of software ?
Debian Science can not have a different opinion from general Debian and
ftpmaster: It's just non-free (and it is a pity in most of the cases).
> I am working now on the tango packaging for the dataacquisition. [1]
>
> [1] http://tango-controls.org
Good luck with the packaging - feel free to ask here in case of trouble.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: