Le Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:23:38 +0200,
Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> a écrit :
> Hi Frédéric,
>
> [I hope you don't mind if I answer in public to make people aware of this
> last chance for adding packages to the science tasks for Squeeze.]
No problem, it was just that I found it not really appropriate to put my reply in
the #592701 bug history, and I forgot to CC the debian-science list.
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:53:18AM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > Is it possible to add the source hkl package [1] in the physics task
> > and also in the data-acquisition.
>
> Well, we do not add source packages but rather binary packages and I
> just added ghkl to physics and dataacquisition (it was just there as hkl
> - but there is no such package like hkl, right).
Yes I was thinking about ghkl and not the hkl source package.
Do you know if the wiki will be updated to present ghkl in the right
tasks ?
>
> > hkl provides also a dev library so it would be nice to add it in the
> > xx-dev packages.
>
> We currently do not have a physics-dev package (even if we should).
> If you (in plural not only Frédéric) can name a set of some packages
> I think we might convince the release team to take over also this
> change - if not, we should do this in Squeeze+1.
In fact this libhkl-dev is meant for the tango control system I a working
on to control diffractometers.
So it should be more appropriète in a dataacquisition-dev.
But it is not yet ready for Squeeze.
So lets postpone until Squeeze+1
> Frédéric, many thanks for your input. It is always welcome and I
> explicitely ask people here on this list to verify that their favourite
> package is listet on the apropriate task.
No problem I am sort interest also as I am the upstream author for this package ;)
> Kind regards
Regards,
Frederic
--
GPG public key 1024D/A59B1171 2009-08-11
fingerprint = 1688 A3D6 F0BD E4DF 2E6B 06AA B6A9 BA6A A59B 1171
uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel <picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature