Re: Asking for common wisdom on new field(s): References*
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 09:19:09AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> The code is ready in Subversion, but I just do not know the
> procedure to get the UDD updated.
If you confirm that the code is ready I might put it in effect on
blends.debian.net first.
> The transfer of the bibliographic information out from the Blends task files is
> one of my motivations for my proposition of using yaml files to feed the UDD.
Good. :-)
> So here is what I propose:
>
> - Since you have the motivation for collecting BibTeX information for a large
> number of science packages, let's chose this format as a standard, and
> document where the files should be in the source and binary packages.
>
> - For the Blends task files, I will remove bibliographic information after it
> is transferred to the UDD and the web sentinel generators are adapted to
> this.
Just to make sure I understand you correctly: You will try to collect
the bibliographic information from Yaroslav's proposed BibTeX files into
UDD? This is fine for me as well - just asking because your intention
is not fully clear.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: