[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Change InsightToolkit to use Review/Statistics?



On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 20:39 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:29:50AM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 20:35 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:43:03PM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote:
> 
> > > > Adding Review means you can also add WrapITK. Something I think is a
> > > > good idea, but others may not.
> > > 
> > > That's an interesting idea: make two API-breaking moves at the same
> > > time!  :-)
> > > 
> > > On the other hand, ITK v4 is moving to WrapITK for wrapping.  So this
> > > also is a change that will happen eventually.
> > > 
> > > Will this break anything in Debian?  I can't find any reverse-depends
> > > on the java, python, or tcl bindings.
> > 
> > I don't know of anything it would break.
> 
> I thought the WrapITK bindings used different symbol names from the
> cswig-style wrapping [1], so I'd expect all non-C++ code to break.
> I'm wondering if there is python or tcl ITK-using code in Debian.
> 
> 
> [1] http://old.nabble.com/ITK-3.10.1-Packages-for-Ubuntu-8.04-and-8.10-td21568917.html

Sorry, I wasn't being clear. I meant I don't know of anything, but I
haven't really looked. Yes, code (python or tcl) written using the old
wrapping style would not work with WrapITK.

-Paul



Reply to: