Hello, > * The Policy document has an "upgrading checklist" built in to it, so > you will probably be able to figure out what you must do to upgrade. > Probably, you must do nothing to comply with new policy. I checked the list and bumped the Standards-Version to 3.9.1. I also set priority to 'high' for this version as it fixes a security bug. The updated package is available at the former URL, namely : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mn-fit/mn-fit_5.13-8.dsc > you are leaving me somewhat puzzled. The QA is listed as the current > maintainer, but only to keep doing what has been left by others, so I > tend to understand what the QA is doing. Instead, we should work on > getting Etienne towards a DM status so the questions for sponsoring > will be a thing of the past. Thanks for your help. I have no personal interest in this package, so I don't think I am a good candidate for adopting it. But giving a bit of love to an orphaned package is what QA uploads are about, no ? :-) > Now that I have replied I am also somewhat caught as a candidate to > sponsor you. However, I feel somewhat overwhelmed with things I need > to do that I dare to forward your RFS to the Debian Science list. > > mn-fit is based on the CERNLIB and as such seems like a perfect place > to become associated with Debian Science. Is there anyone sufficiently > close to this package to help out? Etienne, if there is noone contacting > you, then please PM me again and I sponsor you. Great. If someone in debian-science can sponsor this upload, I would be glad. If other packages in this area need help, please let me know. -- Etienne Millon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature