Re: MPI implementations in squeeze
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 15:46 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> Am Montag, den 28.12.2009, 14:08 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > OK, let's do that. We can always revisit this decision after the squeeze
> > release, but it's important to have something sane for squeeze.
> >
> > Sylvestre, can you take the lead on that, as you proposed? The required
> > steps, I think are:
> > - change mpi-default to use OpenMPI + MPICH2
>
> I took care of that. Changes are in the Git repository. I will do some
> additional testing and coordinate the upload and binNMUs with the
> release team. Should I CC d-s@l.d.o or d-s-m@l.a.d.o?
Hi Manuel and MPI keepers,
were you planning to upload a new version of mpi-default that removes
LAM?
I think it's LAM that's screwing up the gerris mpi builds.
Drew
> > - identify the packages that currently use mpi-default need binNMUs or
> > full source uploads, and file bugs with severity: serious
> > - identify packages that don't use mpi-default yet, but use one of the
> > MPI implementations directly, and file bugs:
> > severity: serious if they use Mpich1 or LAM
> > severity: normal if they use OpenMPI or MPICH2, asking them to switch
> > to mpi-default
>
> This sounds good, I will start filing bugs during the next days.
>
> Best regards
> Manuel
>
>
>
Reply to: