Re: MPICH2 packaging
On 16/06/09 at 11:57 -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:06:34 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > This raises an interesting question: if we package mpich2, couldn't we
> > drop mpich(1) and LAM from Debian? Are there cases where it's more
> > interesting to use mpich v1 or LAM than mpich2 or OpenMPI?
>
> yes, there are many scientific tools that are mpich1-only, so debian
> should continue to support both versions for as long as it is feasible.
Why are they mpich1-only? (What's blocking?)
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: