On 15/06/09 at 18:32 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Hello Pavan, > > Thank you for the inquiry. I've somewhat left MPICH for now (focusing > on OpenMPI, which I don't maintain but use), and assigned its > maintenance to the Debian Scientific Computing team. But I think there > are others very interested in MPICH2, and am copying the debian-science > list to gauge interest. (Adding Camm Maguire, the LAM maintainer as Cc) This raises an interesting question: if we package mpich2, couldn't we drop mpich(1) and LAM from Debian? Are there cases where it's more interesting to use mpich v1 or LAM than mpich2 or OpenMPI? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature