Re: Extensible Simulation Package for Research on Soft matter

[Chris Walker <chrisw@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> writes:

> Chris Walker wrote:
> > 
> > I suspect "simulation" is too generic. The packages you list perfom
> > abinitio quantum mechanics to determine structure[1]
> > 
> <snip>
> 
> I support this point of view. "Simulation", IMO, also comprises packages like
> gerris, FeeFem++, or other CAE-programs. It is a classification lateral to the
> scientific fields chemistry, engineering, mathematics, physics, etc.

Thinking aloud, but would this generality across scientific fields
make it a good debtag for science packages? 

Chris