Re: Extensible Simulation Package for Research on Soft matter
Jörg-Volker Peetz <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Chris Walker wrote:
> > I suspect "simulation" is too generic. The packages you list perfom
> > abinitio quantum mechanics to determine structure
> I support this point of view. "Simulation", IMO, also comprises packages like
> gerris, FeeFem++, or other CAE-programs. It is a classification lateral to the
> scientific fields chemistry, engineering, mathematics, physics, etc.
Thinking aloud, but would this generality across scientific fields
make it a good debtag for science packages?