Re: Which mailing list for maintainer field?

To: debian-science@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Which mailing list for maintainer field?
From: Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre.ledru@inria.fr>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 16:23:38 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1211552618.24426.249.camel@korcula.inria.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080523141325.GA7174@melusine.lehobey.net>
References: <E1JzVnz-0005BG-AY@ries.debian.org> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0805231459500.23728@wr-linux02> <[🔎] 97fdf2d70805230637p1ca6f052o654548bd3b6bcb4e@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20080523141325.GA7174@melusine.lehobey.net>

> I think it is, but we should make a policy of whether using
> debian-science or debian-science-maintainers
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
> for the maintainer field.
Manuel and I are writing the policy and we detailed this point.
It is clear that should be: 
Debian Science Team <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>

At least for the Frederic's point:
> The latter one might be more sensible if some people on debian-science
> do not want to be bothered by dak and bts messages for each package.

Sylvestre

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which mailing list for maintainer field?
  - From: "Teemu Ikonen" <tpikonen@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: cbflib_0.7.9.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
  - From: "Teemu Ikonen" <tpikonen@gmail.com>
- Which mailing list for maintainer field?
  - From: Frederic Lehobey <Frederic@Lehobey.net>

Prev by Date: Which mailing list for maintainer field?
Next by Date: Re: cbflib_0.7.9.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Previous by thread: Which mailing list for maintainer field?
Next by thread: Re: Which mailing list for maintainer field?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread