New Debian ROOT (5.09/01) packages for i386 unstable
Dear all,
Forget about what I said on the unavailability of the latest source
packages, I was trying to apt-get --build in a directory in which I did
not have write permissions [1].
I tried to build the package, but it quickly stops, complaining about the absence of libX11...
charles@sorbet:~$ LC_ALL=C fakeroot apt-get source --build root
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Need to get 16.6MB of source archives.
Get:1 http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov unstable/root root 5.09.01-2 (dsc) [1434B]
Get:2 http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov unstable/root root 5.09.01-2 (tar) [15.9MB]
Get:3 http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov unstable/root root 5.09.01-2 (diff) [678kB]
Fetched 3B in 1s (2B/s)
Skipping unpack of already unpacked source in root-5.09.01
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is root
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 5.09.01-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Christian Holm Christensen <cholm@nbi.dk>
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture powerpc
debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp config.status configure-stamp
rm -rf minuit2/src/Minuit-1_7_6/src/.libs/ freetype/src/freetype-2.1.9
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
/usr/bin/make distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/charles/root-5.09.01'
Makefile:13: config/Makefile.config: No such file or directory
Makefile:24: config/Makefile.: No such file or directory
Please, run ./configure first
make[1]: *** [config/Makefile.] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/charles/root-5.09.01'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
build/unix/makecintdlls.sh clean
rm -rf bin lib include \
system.rootrc \
config/Makefile.config \
README/Changelog \
etc/system.rootrc \
etc/system.rootauthrc \
etc/system.rootdaemonrc \
etc/root.mimes \
build/misc/root-help.el \
debian/*.files \
debian/*.install \
debian/shlibs.local \
freetype/src/freetype-2.1.3
dh_clean
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
./configure --prefix=/usr \
--mandir=/usr/share/man/man1 \
--docdir=/usr/share/doc/root \ --cintincdir=/usr/lib/root/5.09/cint \ --etcdir=/etc/root \
--with-sys-iconpath=/usr/share/pixmaps \
--libdir=/usr/lib/root/5.09 \
--enable-table --enable-roofit --enable-ruby --enable-qt --enable-minuit2 --enable-pythia --enable-xrootd --enable-shared --enable-soversion --enable-explicitlink --disable-rpath --disable-afs --disable-srp --disable-builtin-freetype --disable-builtin-afterimage --disable-builtin-pcre --disable-alien --disable-rfio --disable-chirp --disable-dcache --disable-gfal --disable-globus --disable-monalisa --disable-oracle --disable-pythia --disable-pythia6 --disable-sapdb --disable-venus
Configuring for linuxppc64gcc
Checking for libX11 ... no
configure: libX11 (package x11-devel) MUST be installed
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
Build command 'cd root-5.09.01 && dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc' failed.
E: Child process failed
However, I aready have libX11:
charles@sorbet:~$ LC_ALL=C sudo apt-get install libx11-6
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
libx11-6 is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 269 not upgraded.
charles@sorbet:~$ sudo apt-get install libX11-dev
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait
libx11-dev est déjà la plus récente version disponible.
0 mis à jour, 0 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 269 non mis à jour.
and x11-devel does not exist:
charles@sorbet:~$ sudo apt-get install x11-devel
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait
E: Impossible de trouver le paquet x11-devel
I'll be happy to retry when somebody will tell me what to install...
[1] Strangely, the error message says
Failed to fetch http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov/debian-root/pool/root/sid/r/root/root_5.09.01-2.dsc, and the package is not visible when I visit the repository with firefox (http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov/debian-root/pool/root/sid/r/root/), although it is downloadable...
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles
Reply to: