Re: Bug#555540: any news on tokyocabinet's FTBFS?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:32:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:47:58AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> > It seems that on consecutive runs of the test case[1] in question, it aborts
> > at different points each time and even succeeds in one in five runs or so.
> > Moreover, while the combined assert() condition fails, separate assert() calls
> > for each of the condition succeed while their combination still fail(!)
>
> Does tokyocabinet use multi-threading or some other means of
> concurrency? For me this looks like race conditions. They may live in
> the glibc, as there were some fixes in this area lately.
Thanks guys! Indeed tokyocabinet does use multi-threading.
$ find tokyocabinet-1.4.37/ -type f | xargs grep thread | wc -l
730
$ grep -c thread tokyocabinet-1.4.37/tcbmttest.c
60
Bastian, I don't see any related recent entries in the glibc changelog. If the
fixes are still pending, is there a bug we could denote as a blocker for
#555540?
Cheers,
Serafeim
--
debtags-organised WNPP bugs: http://members.hellug.gr/serzan/wnpp
Reply to: