Re: reiserfs + ...
Recently there were several articles concerning performance comparision of
EXT2/3, ReiserFS and etc.
In different tests different FS won. But mostly : ReiserFS (performance on
large files, high CPU usage) and EXT3 (small files, low CPU usage).
As for myself I am planning to migrate all my EXT2 to EXT3 (/ or /tmp), and
keep /usr, /var on ReiserFS. No ReiserFS (for me) on server installations.
--- "Vladimir N.Velychko" <vovka@usr.al.lg.ua> wrote:
> îÏ ×ÏÐÒÏÓ ×Ó£ ÏÄÎÏ ÏÓÔÁÌÓÑ - ÞÔÏ ÄÕÍÁÅÔ ÎÁÒÏÄ ÐÏ ÜÔÏÍÕ
> ÐÏ×ÏÄÕ - ÎÕÖÅÎ ÌÉ reiserfs, ËÁË ÓËÏÒÏÓÔÎÁÑ É ÐÒÏÉÚ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌØÎÁÑ
> fs, ÎÁ readonly ÒÁÚÄÅÌÅ ÉÌÉ ext2 ÔÁÍ ÂÕÄÅÔ ÒÁÂÏÔÁÔØ ÎÅ ÈÕÖÅ?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-russian-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: