Am Freitag, dem 12.03.2021 um 22:19 +0100 schrieb Klaumi Klingsporn: > Am / On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 21:22:08 +0100 [..] > and this time the tests passed fine in all reprotest builds > but reprotest failed nevertheless: > > "INFO:reprotest:Running diff: ['diff', '-ru', > '/builds/ruby-team/mentors/webgen/debian/output/reprotest/control', > '/builds/ruby-team/mentors/webgen/debian/output/reprotest/experiment-1'] > Binary files > /builds/ruby-team/mentors/webgen/debian/output/reprotest/control/source- > root/webgen-doc_1.7.2-1+salsaci_all.deb > and > /builds/ruby-team/mentors/webgen/debian/output/reprotest/experiment-1/source- > root/webgen-doc_1.7.2-1+salsaci_all.deb > differ" You can have that easier by using debdiff or diffoscope to compare the files. diffoscope debian/output/reprotest/control/source-root/ debian/output/reprotest/experiment-1/source-root/ The contents of data.tar.xz in both packages are the same, they only seem to have different timestamps, which I find ok. Still the tarball differs in size in both packages. That doesn't make much sense to me. The files in both packages are actually the same except for the modification time. I wouldn't call this "unreproducible". I think you could get rid of this by only linking to all rdoc files. But we should fix rdoc instead of doing this. IMHO this result is perfectly acceptable. Regards, Daniel -- Regards, Daniel Leidert <dleidert@debian.org> | https://www.wgdd.de/ GPG-Key RSA4096 / BEED4DED5544A4C03E283DC74BCD0567C296D05D GPG-Key ED25519 / BD3C132D8B3805D1808123AB7ACE00941E338C78 If you like my work consider sponsoring me via https://www.patreon.com/join/dleidert
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part