Re: Should libruby2.x have Provides: ruby-foo (= x.y.z) for the gems it ships?

To: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Should libruby2.x have Provides: ruby-foo (= x.y.z) for the gems it ships?
From: Georg Faerber <georg@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 23:43:10 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20200412234310.GB438@debian>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] dd756e5a688811a64163d829ac8b9ca29937cc97.camel@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] dd756e5a688811a64163d829ac8b9ca29937cc97.camel@debian.org>

Hi Daniel, all,

On 20-04-13 01:03:47, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> What are your thoughts?

Sounds reasonable, and good!

Thanks,
cheers,
Georg

Reply to:

References:
- Should libruby2.x have Provides: ruby-foo (= x.y.z) for the gems it ships?
  - From: Daniel Leidert <dleidert@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Should libruby2.x have Provides: ruby-foo (= x.y.z) for the gems it ships?
Next by Date: Re: Should libruby2.x have Provides: ruby-foo (= x.y.z) for the gems it ships?
Previous by thread: Should libruby2.x have Provides: ruby-foo (= x.y.z) for the gems it ships?
Next by thread: Re: Should libruby2.x have Provides: ruby-foo (= x.y.z) for the gems it ships?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread