Hi David, Praveen, On 07/01/20 12:55 am, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On തി, Jan 6, 2020 at 20:12, David Suárez <david.sephirot@gmail.com> wrote: >> Just updated the packaged in salsa. >> >> It gets a new major version (1 -> 2), so they are not compatible. The >> unique reverse dependency is gitlab (but in experimental version). So >> it's should not breaks nothing, except for end users of the library. >> > > I don't think that reasoning is helpful. We are maintaining gitlab in > experimental because some maintainers are too slow with transitions > (grpc/protobuf) even when we do all the rebuilding and filing bugs. So > even breaking in experimental is not okay, especially because it keeps > happening very often. > > But in this specific case, we are probably okay as we already use 2.9.32 > and this is only a minor update. But many times even minor updates have > broken gitlab, so I'd prefer to test them (at least core packages). > >> Could any DD review and sponsor the upload ? >> > > We'll run the upstream ci to check if it is okay before the update. The MR has been created upstream. Link here[1]. NOTE: If this pans out the way it should, we'd need to update ruby-parallel, too. Best, Utkarsh --- [1]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/merge_requests/22545
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature