[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: ruby-heapy 0.1.4-1



Not sure if you're subscribed to the list yet?
If not, please do :)
Find the review below.

On 22/09/19 11:40 pm, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 22/09/19 9:09 pm, Priyanka Saggu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
>> points listed on
>> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
>> Although there is one Lintian warning i.e. "W: ruby-heapy:
>> binary-without-manpage usr/bin/heapy" which I am asked to ignore
>> intentionally after having a discussion with the Debian-diaspora team.
>>
>> Could you please sponsor them?
>>
>> ruby-heapy 0.1.4-1
>> [https://salsa.debian.org/priyankasaggu119-guest/ruby-heapy]
> Things to fix:
> - Even with tests being present, tests aren't running yet. Please enable
> them.
> - Extended description is short. Please write a meaningful description
> for the same :)
> - No need of d/clean -> can't see Gemfile.lock.
> - Patch template present -> clean unnecessary stuff. Is patch even
> necessary? (I didn't check, though).
> - d/upstream/metadata -> "Name" is "heapy", not "ruby-heapy".
> - d/watch -> use version=4, clean line 2 and 3.
> - Last commit doesn't make sense, is it even required?
> - You committed .pc? Why? That fails two successive builds for me.
> - In your 4th commit, you're committing a change in the upstream file,
> that is so wrong :/
>
> At this stage, I can't go on and on, there are so many commits,
> sometimes contradicting one another.
> My opinion would be to restart all over again and only commit once you
> think no more changes are needed for that particular file. Feel free to
> ping someone in the diaspora channel if you need more help :)
>
> Thanks for the work so far! Looking forward to seeing more packages.
>
>
> Best,
> Utkarsh

Best,
Utkarsh


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: