Hi all, I would like to help with this, but don't want to step on peoples feet: On 18-02-01 09:08:09, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > As you might have noticed, during the last week the ruby2.5 transition > was put in motion. ruby2.5 has been in testing for a while, and we did > a couple of test rebuilds with it to assess the size of the problem. > It looks good enough, so I decided to go ahead with the transition. > > I just did an upload of ruby-defaults enabling builds for ruby2.5. This > should be available in the repository in a few hours from now. Now is > the time I need the most help: we need to fix every package that has a > problem with ruby2.5. > > The transition is being tracked together with the release team at: > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.5.html > > The packages that are listed there that can just be rebuilt against > ruby2.5 will be binNMUed soon. The ones that fail are currently listed > here: > > https://people.debian.org/~terceiro/ruby2.5/builds/#FAIL > > These failures should have priority in the fixing because they may > provide native extensions that are used by other pure-Ruby packages. > > The full list of bugs that need to be fixed (including the above + all > pure-Ruby packages that presented some problem during the rebuild) is > at: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby2.5;users=debian-ruby@lists.debian.org > > Last but not least, we have a wiki page with a plan/TODO list for the > transition. It could be an interesting read: > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/ruby2.5 I guess there is no priority list for these packages? Therefore, should I just start from the top? Cheers, Georg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature