Hi Hleb, all, On 18-03-21 23:29:33, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > On 3/21/18, Cédric Boutillier <boutil@debian.org> wrote: > > Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new > > ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on > > ci.debian.net. > > I've checked ruby-gettext-setup and can say that it doesn't actually > use anything from gettext gem, only from fast-gettext. So its test > failures caused by something else, not the new gettext version. I would be interested in how you came to this conclusion: ruby-gettext-setup FTBFS now, with errors like /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext/tools/parser/ruby.rb:50:in `gsub': invalid byte sequence in US-ASCII (ArgumentError) See #894829 for details. IOW: We should take regressions in autopkgtests seriously. If we don't, chances are high we're just running into situations like this one, causing extra work for all people involved. Cheers, Georg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature