Re: Bug#813237: transition: ruby2.3
On 03/03/16 04:52, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:10:54PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 02/03/16 13:25, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
>>> Emilio,
>>>
>>> I think we're quite close to be able to drop 2.2 - it's already in
>>> experimental, we're quite confident it works, etc.
>>>
>>> Right now we know that uwsgi and weechat will need manual fixing and
>>> there are open bugs against them (#816315, #816312).
>>>
>>> When do you think it would be ok for us to drop 2.2? We'll need
>>> another round of binNMUs for all the packages listed on the tracker.
>>> (We're running another test rebuild of those right now.)
>>
>> You can go ahead.
>
> So I have uploaded ruby-defaults making the switch on unstable earlier
> today. Please binNMU the following packages:
>
> broccoli-ruby
> geos
> graphviz
> marisa
> ngraph-gtk
> notmuch
> qtruby
> redland-bindings
> ruby-standalone
> rubyluabridge
> subversion
> treil
> vim
> vim-command-t
> libguestfs
Scheduled.
I've also scheduled zeroc-ice as that can be built on the buildds (the bad
packages are in Build-Depends-Indep and the buildds don't install those except
for arch:all builds).
Emilio
Reply to: