[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#813237: transition: ruby2.3



On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:10:54PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 02/03/16 13:25, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > Emilio,
> > 
> > I think we're quite close to be able to drop 2.2 - it's already in
> > experimental, we're quite confident it works, etc.
> > 
> > Right now we know that uwsgi and weechat will need manual fixing and
> > there are open bugs against them (#816315, #816312).
> > 
> > When do you think it would be ok for us to drop 2.2? We'll need
> > another round of binNMUs for all the packages listed on the tracker.
> > (We're running another test rebuild of those right now.)
> 
> You can go ahead.

So I have uploaded ruby-defaults making the switch on unstable earlier
today. Please binNMU the following packages:

broccoli-ruby
geos
graphviz
marisa
ngraph-gtk
notmuch
qtruby
redland-bindings
ruby-standalone
rubyluabridge
subversion
treil
vim
vim-command-t
libguestfs

-- 
Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: