Re: favico.js and sprockets 3
On 2016, ജനുവരി 8 8:44:49 PM IST, Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>On 08/01/16 09:01 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> [Copying uploader of lubjs-favico.js and libjs-mouse trap]
>>
>> On 2016, ജനുവരി 8 4:04:06 PM IST, "Libor Klepáč"
><libor.klepac@bcom.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>> Today, you have to use libjs-mousetrap from stretch, because in sid,
>>> yours
>>> libjs-mousetrap was replaced last weekend by another package with
>>> different
>>> structure
>>> https://packages.qa.debian.org/libj/libjs-mousetrap.html
>>> is that intentional?
>>>
>>
>> Hi Alexander, I hope the last two uploads were not intentional
>takeovers. Both uploads broke their corresponding ruby-rails-assets-*
>packages.
>>
>> 1. In case of future uploads, please keep the same file names as
>existing packages so symlinks won't break.
>> 2. If you really have to change them, please inform us so we can make
>the necessary changes to prevent breakage.
>> 3. As with all library updates, please check reverse dependencies are
>not broken.
>
>Sorry, that was absolutely not intentional, I really should have
>noticed.
No worries :) It happens to everyone, once in a while.
>What do you want to do about it? What were the source packages that
>provided those binaries and which ones should we keep?
ruby-rails-assets-favico.js provided libjs-favico.js, I have already stopped providing libjs-favico.js and depend on your libjs-favico.js
We have to still fix ruby-rails-assets-mousetrap. We can keep your source packages.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Reply to: