Hello, On 08/01/16 09:01 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > [Copying uploader of lubjs-favico.js and libjs-mouse trap] > > On 2016, ജനുവരി 8 4:04:06 PM IST, "Libor Klepáč" <libor.klepac@bcom.cz> wrote: >> >> Today, you have to use libjs-mousetrap from stretch, because in sid, >> yours >> libjs-mousetrap was replaced last weekend by another package with >> different >> structure >> https://packages.qa.debian.org/libj/libjs-mousetrap.html >> is that intentional? >> > > Hi Alexander, I hope the last two uploads were not intentional takeovers. Both uploads broke their corresponding ruby-rails-assets-* packages. > > 1. In case of future uploads, please keep the same file names as existing packages so symlinks won't break. > 2. If you really have to change them, please inform us so we can make the necessary changes to prevent breakage. > 3. As with all library updates, please check reverse dependencies are not broken. Sorry, that was absolutely not intentional, I really should have noticed. What do you want to do about it? What were the source packages that provided those binaries and which ones should we keep? -- Alexandre Viau aviau@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature