On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:15:17PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> wrote: > > > OTOH we have to patch N packages that rely on launchy. I'm not sure > > > where to draw the line, i.e. which value of N is too large that it would > > > be easier to just bite the bullet and actually have launchy in Debian. > > > > Maybe this is a topic for the meeting? :-) > > > > Maybe if N >= 2 it makes sense to just upload and forget (err, I mean > > do other things than discuss if/when to upload super small packages). > > FYI, I have just uploaded a ruby-launchy-shim package that will solve > this. It is currently sitting in NEW. The code is in git. ... and it was just ACCEPTED. :) so we can stop patching packages to not use launchy. -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature