On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 08:12:03PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: > Hi, > I've prepared the packaging of the gem 'rotp' which is a runtime > dependency in the dependency chain of GitLab. It is lintian-happy. > Since it requires RSpec 3, I have targeted it for experimental. It > builds fine in chroot (with RSpec 3 from experimental). Even though > the gem bundles an executable with it, I've named the package > ruby-rotp as the executable usage seemed trivial as per upstream readme. I would probably prefer rotp-ruby for the binary name. It has the advantage of being proposed when tab-completing the command line. Since rspec3 arrived in unstable, you can now target unstable for your package (but still indicate in the build-depend line that it needs ruby-rspec (>= 3~). Cheers, Cédric
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature