Hi Cédric, On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Before looking at the package, I would like to know if you are > really interested in having ruby-coveralls packaged in Debian, or > if you found it has a (build-)dependency for another project. I packaged it primarily because is a B-D of several Ruby packages I prepared recently and I'm aware is not a library very useful from Debian PoV due to its requirements on Github and Travis stuff. However, I anticipate that I'm going to need that library for a project I'll develop in the future and I'd would like to have it packaged in Debian. That was also the reason why I was poking the ITPs bugs for vcr and webmock because I'd like to see those testing frameworks available in Debian soon although I didn't the chance yet to see what's blocking it. > Hence I do not see at the moment any use case for a ruby-coveralls > package. But maybe I missed something. If it is the case, then please > correct me. As you say, right now it doesn't have an inmmediate use case in Debian but expect to run this software from workstation deployed with Debian so I think it doesn't hurt to package it. Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=4CB7FE1E280ECC90F29A597E6E608B637D8967E9 "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature